‘Never trust a politician.’
Was the advice Henry’s mate gave him; which seemed strange because is mate was
a politician. Their friendship had nothing to do with the cronyism of politics
they shared similar interests and Henry didn’t if the subject was broached, as
long as I didn’t go on too long, anyway if it did, he would slope off home.
Politics is not the exclusive realm
of politicians and parliament, it pervades through society and is no different
to the pecking order in a hen-house. But in the greater context, whatever or
wherever politics rears its head money and power are sidekicks and whether it
is money, power or both, there seems to be an agenda.
In large cities, there is a
housing crisis. It’s termed ‘housing’ but really it is land – land prices will always
rise, simply because they aren’t making any more. And, if the climate change
theorist are right, there’s going to be less.
It stands to reason then, most
land is a good investment, resulting in the trend for people with equity to
borrow and reinvest in additional properties. This is happens because interest
rates are very low.
We are told that at
retirement, you need to have around a million bucks ‘to support a reasonable
lifestyle’. How then is someone on wages going to do that when their savings
accrue a low interest rate? Currently property accrues at a far more rapid
rate.
When it comes to interest rates
who is controlling them – politicians or the banks? If money is a commodity of supply
and demand, how come all the governments of most nations have huge deficits, owing
undreamed-of amounts, yet if Joe Blow saves, he attracts a meager interest? What
happened to the universal theory of supply and demand?
If you happen to be on a low
income, how are you going to accrue a million bucks for your retirement? Most
likely the politicians don’t give a toss, but low incomes come from the
competitive environment they promote.
Take cleaning as an example.
If you work for a commercial cleaning company and they tender (or offer a
price) to clean a school for a year. The boss will offer the lowest price possible
to win the contract. Therefore there is not enough fat in the price to offer
the workers a reasonable wage. All very good for the school, but stalemate for
the workers.
We hear the old platitude from
the politician, ‘I know how tough it is on a low income, I was raised by a solo
parent in a state house.’
Kids though do not manage a
household budget and are mostly unaware of the hardship their parents face.
There is a difference between
an employer and a boss, but without dwelling on the difference, workers face
problems because their bosses do not understand or adhere to the labour laws. Often,
the boss doesn’t recognise the need to take appropriate breaks, does not pay
for extra time worked and has an unrealistic expectation of what a worker can
do in a day. To some extent this comes through bosses not working up through
the ranks and experiencing ‘the working life’, instead becoming the boss
through owning a certificate or a degree.
Henry was stirred into writing
to his local MP in the 1980’s (unhappily vindicated) when a so-called leftist government
under a regime nicknamed ‘Rogernomics’ privatised government departments and began
the selling off of state assets. Fundamentally changing the financial structure
of the country, the policies also created widespread social change. The ‘trickle
down’ theory where ‘if the rich became richer, those riches would trickle down
to the poor’, turned out to be a crock.
It is an example where personal
and political philosophy outweighs sound management.
This Roger fella [stupidly] said
he would rather toss money into the sea than invest in forests.
The ‘corporatisation’ of the
forestry industry saw a skilled workforce demobbed, which effectively caused a
loss of jobs in rural area and the demise of small towns. Included were ethnic
minorities and workers with skills not required elsewhere. Meantime corporate
offices became lavish and consultants provided expensive advice but without
accountability.
The corporation process was
across the board over all government departments causing a social experiment that
is ongoing and unable to be fixed adequately three and a half decades later.
The 1980’s reform was like a watchmaker
making repairs with a sledgehammer. Perhaps government departments needed
fixing – so why fix them? They threw the spuds out with the peelings!
Discrepancies rancor Henry
and he reckons it’s obvious something is out of kilter when the top football
player earned 80 million USD in 2014 while the Filipino woman working in a rest
home earns 10.65 USD per hour equaling 22 152 USD per annum.

No comments:
Post a Comment