Sunday, February 25, 2018

Mushrooms





We’ve got mushrooms in our lawn, nine of them! Well that’s hardly Earth-shattering news, but it’s one of life’s little victories for me! I happen to be partial to field mushrooms, fried in butter or stewed in a little water with salt and butter then thickened with a little cornflour. I know they’re not to everyone’s taste, and if that’s you, I’m sorry, but usually I take every opportunity to dine on them. But I won’t be eating any of the nine! I’m leaving them to seed – or should I say, spore?

Fungi are incredibly diverse living organisms, from tinea between an athlete’s toes to the world’s largest living organism, a mycorrhizal fungi supporting the mighty redwood forests of North America. Mushrooms are the fruiting body of mycorrhiza fungi, those tiny, cotton-like filaments attached to the roots of all plants in a symbiotic relationship. The filaments spread out like little explorers to search for nutrients suitable for the host plant. The plants’ roots loyally follow. The filaments, mycelium, also help the tree by converting the nutrients for uptake by the hair roots. Douglas fir for instance will not thrive well without the ideal species of mycorrhiza. Don’t you think Mother Nature’s clever?

For years now, maybe forty of them, I’ve been collecting field mushrooms for the pot, and kept the skin I peeled from the top because with the skin, tiny bits of the gills come off. The gills are where the spores are manufactured. As well, from time to time a whole mushroom might have sciarid fly larvae (I don’t like protein with my mushies), so it would go with the bits of skin. I spread the waste material on the lawn in the hope that spores might germinate and one day we might have mushrooms. Well we have! The mycorrhiza, I’m certain has established!

I don’t eat the Birch Bolete mushrooms that sometimes emerge in great profusion under my silver birch trees. A German family often come along to collect them, and a restaurateur used to collect them, or I would take a bucket-full to her, but that’s when she had European chef. Sometimes Asians might jump the fence but they also take a brown toadstool growing there. They assure me that they know species and it’s edible, but my research tells me they are toxic! It freaks me out a bit, so I tell them it’s entirely their risk! 

My Mum and I were the only ones in our family who ate mushrooms. There are family stories that I could smell them in the paddock as we drove by, but when I think about it, it’s more likely to have been the smell was new-mown hay or even a haystack! Since I have mentioned my Mum… Mushrooms can be a feast, but can hardly be called a decadent feast, but we did do decadent! When there wasn’t anyone else around, she would grate an apple into a pudding plate, liberally sprinkle full cream milk powder over it, plus a little cinnamon, and then douse the lot with cream! I wouldn’t eat it now but as a kid, I sure lapped it up!

Back in the day, when I lived in a one-roomed hut, living pretty much off the land, I was out hunting for rabbits with my dog, Wally, when I came across a gulley that was white with mushrooms. In those days I had a little Commer Cob stationwagon, so I filled the back with mushrooms. On my way back to camp, I paid some visits. In exchange for mushrooms I was given tomatoes by a tomato grower’s wife; some eggs by a poultry farmer and a pound of sausages by the butcher! I kept a bowlful for myself and took the rest to the pub in exchange for two free house meals! A good morning’s work, in my book!

On my farm, I planted some oak trees, four varieties, with the intention of fungiciding the area, buying a black truffle, ripening it and spreading it around the trees. But an expert came to the nursery who later visited my trees and poured cold water on my idea! He told me some willow trees were too close so the truffles wouldn’t take, so with him being the expert, I bowed to his knowledge. I’d never do that again! Experts have their ways, set rules if you like. I’m left handed and daily I break right handed rules! So whenever anyone says something should be done a certain way, I like to question why. If they say something can’t be done, I experiment to see if it can. Experts follow the norm because they must. It’s up to mugs like you and me, poor, hard up, mortals who can’t afford experts, try different methods, trial new ideas and come up with new techniques!  

Anyway, our friendly expert convinced the nursery owners that growing oak and hazelnut (filbert) trees inoculated with PĂ©rigord Black Truffle could be a financial winner! We began trials and production on a small scale. The black truffle mycorrhiza is weak compared to other mycorrhiza abundant around the nursery. Not only in the nursery, anywhere in fact, fungal spores float in the air all the time! To inoculate truffle mycelium into tree roots, hygiene became a huge factor. Inoculation sounds scientific but all you do is wash the seedling roots, make a slurry in a blender with a ripe truffle, dip the plant roots in the goo and plant it. But the trick is, and only Mother Nature can do it, the spore has to germinate on the root hair tip as it forms. And that’s tricky. We were moderately successful, but the cost of production was more than customers were prepared to pay, which made it a fizzer! Actually more to the point, our quality control was too expensive because we had to sample each plant’s mycelium by having its DNA checked.

So, I’ve never tasted a truffle but I’m happy enough to go through life without doing so. Never mind, I’m expecting a bumper crop of mushrooms next season and will delight in consuming the culinary delicacy picked straight from our own lawn!  

Friday, February 23, 2018

Firearm Debate





In the wake of recent school killings, there’s real outrage from the student survivors because they experienced fear, felt loss, and remain feeling vulnerable in their learning institution. Something few politicians have faced. The student outrage is directed at government because when it comes to firearms government prefers the status quo and are therefore seen to be sitting on their hands. In the war of words, as in any political debate, words are used to score points that supporters will cheer at, but nobody’s prepared to step into the others’ shoes to reach any sort of balance, it’s hard-line, no movement. Adversarial debating has no place with issues relating to humanity, it isn’t appropriate.

The most immediate action to be taken it seems, is to train and arm school teachers. I wonder, have the teachers been consulted? There are inherent risks with the idea. I miss as many rabbits as I bag and I shoot at them on a daily basis! Admittedly, they are a smaller target than humans but in a confused situation, if the bullet doesn’t hit the target, where does it go? Collateral damage. My .22 rimfire can potentially kill at 1.4km, and my bullets are small compared with those used in most US weapons. If the bullet doesn’t hit bone, where does it go? More collateral damage. Schools are populated places, where learning should be fun - not war zones!

In a recent case, an off-duty policeman shot his wife and wounded her lover, not because of mental instability, he was bloody angry and exacted revenge. Psychology is an indefinite branch of medicine and therefore mental checks can have a diminished value. All a psychologist can do really do is ask questions, and if the replies tick the boxes because the client is barefaced lying, what can he/she do? We all might be able to make our own judgement about someone’s sanity by looking at them, but if a psychologist did that professionally, they would end up in court. Blaming mental instability for mass shootings points the finger of suspicion on anyone with mental issues – you can’t do that! It would be far better to interview associates of license applicants privately. If someone wants a firearm the person should give the names of say, ten referees, and an inspector randomly interviews maybe half of them. The cost is met by the applicant. In this country spouses are interviewed before a firearm licence is granted.

I’ve been trying to get my head around the whole situation, and all is not clear to me. It seems, one of the big reasons of not altering the second amendment is the need for a militia. This stems from experience during the Revolution. There have been other wars on American soil, so why hark back to the Revolution? These days there are a number of law enforcement agencies, how does a militia fit in with them? If the need is genuine, and I don’t have a clue, why do the firearms need to be in the hands of individuals, private people? Why is there not an armoury in every county office, or whatever place deemed a safe place? There could then be training days and live firings - if that’s what’s needed.

From what I have read, and what people tell me, America is a far more dangerous place that I would have believed! It’s no secret that I’m personally anti-firearm, but I’d like to understand the other side. Banning firearms is not going to happen and the way things are nor should it – it would be illogical. I’ve never so much as handled an assault rifle, but I can’t imagine one being immediately useful at home when baddies pay a visit. My trusty .22 rifle is by law, locked away and not quickly accessible. There must be similar laws in the US? I imagine there are pistols tucked away at the ready? Is that legal? Even so at home or in a vehicle, if you needed to protect yourself, wouldn’t an assault rife be unwieldy?  So why are they necessary? Frankly if I was afraid sitting at home, as many Americans apparently are, I’d be sitting on my couch with a shotgun across my knees! You don’t have to be so accurate with a shotgun!

With regard to mass shootings, there appears to be something under the surface, something you see in so many western movies. ‘I’ll go down, and I’ll take as many as I can with me!’ The likes of William Cody, Jessie James and the others, enjoyed the power of standing behind their weapons, and they enjoyed their notoriety! There’s a similar undercurrent taking place in modern times. A combination of suicide by cop or to take out as many as possible on their way down. Consigning their deed to the history books. A competition.

I attended the a Hunter Training School as part of my job, there, they laid down the basic firearm rules, the same rules are used by the police today when testing candidates wanting firearms licenses. These are the headings, they are expanded in the handout literature:
. Treat every firearm as if it was loaded.
. Point the firearm in a safe direction – never at people.
. Load the firearm only when ready to fire.
. Identify the target. Not by colour or movement.
. Check the firing zone – what’s behind the target?
. Store safely – ammunition in a different place to the firearm.
. Avoid alcohol or drugs.
The other rule, not adopted by the police was to never trust a safety catch! Ever!

The second amendment gives the right to own and bear arms. Is that it? Or are there rules laid down about firearm safety, and more to the point, are they observed?  This is not a criticism, but I’m interested to know.

Tuesday, February 20, 2018

From the Hip



From the Hip

Poetry’s a vehicle, a way of saying,
 what needs to be said.
Rhyming and flow don’t matter
when
there are words important
of happiness, humour
of sadness or woe, of horror or beauty!
Powerful messages!
And cries for help or empathy
all needing to be said.
Well here’s a short recitation
that needed said!
It’s about guns, and America!
It’s a plea said with passion,
Hits the nail on the head!
Go to YouTube, here’s the link.
Listen carefully and have a think!